Can you edit this opening para of my book on Accreditation in Engineering. It has nothing to do here on Book Rix. I am just curious. Can I not capitalize something I feel is important to me like Technology, I was criticised. I know in normal talk, I would not, but I wanted to give it LIfe, so I ventured to make 'T' in Technology capital. I will wait to hear from you. I know there is a little spelling mistake too below. I will... Show more
Can you edit this opening para of my book on Accreditation in Engineering. It has nothing to do here on Book Rix. I am just curious. Can I not capitalize something I feel is important to me like Technology, I was criticised. I know in normal talk, I would not, but I wanted to give it LIfe, so I ventured to make 'T' in Technology capital. I will wait to hear from you. I know there is a little spelling mistake too below. I will correct it later after I hear from you.
Here is the whole para:
With Technology progressing by leaps and bounds almost daily, time has come today to put some teeth in some of the lax processes of otherwise well defined principles of Accreditation..Having been involved in a few of these exercises, it set me thinking how come there is none to go to if there is a let up somewhere. I sat down to open up my Dead Sea scrolls of years past and began to scribble down some of the gnawing weaknesses I noticed in some of the past assessments; this litle work was born only after that painful review.I hope if taken in the sense intended it may very well deliver its intended goal and help achieve true compliance. Everybody understands the basics of ISO 17025, base document around which this book revolves, it is in its implementation where the ball is dropped halfway or close to the goal. Some values are too absolute to be compromised and that is where extreme cauation is desired. This little easy to read piece may help point out where caution is needed and where we can make a difference; we need to treat the exercise more as a public safety than just as a job.
Thank you.